Sunday, 8 September 2013

Atheists are mentally ill

This has been surfing around on the internet lately:

 "Atheists are mentally ill. 

 All research and evidence leads to the conclusion of these facts: 

  • Atheists are deeply depressed. 
  • Atheists have the higher suicide rate out of any belief system. 
  • Atheists suffer from social anxiety and negative perception (confidence issues).
  • Atheists have an irrational hatred and obsession with religion leading to more social problems. 
  • There are no mental health benefits of atheism. It is devoid of rational thinking and mental protection.

Sources: (The Association of Suicide Rates with Individual-Level Suicide Attitudes: A Cross-National Analysis) (A global perspective in the epidemiology of suicide) (Atheists, Agnostics, and Apostates) (Psychological Distress Among Religious Nonbelievers: A Systematic Review)" 

As if evidence was needed. The delusional traits of persecution that the atheist exhibits combined with their irrational hatred of religion and religious people is more than enough evidence revealing that the atheist is mentally ill and incapable of thinking logically.

The atheist's championing of the evolution theory is especially more evidence of their mental instability. They don't even understand it. Evolution doesn't debunk God or even The Bible for that matter. In fact all three are fully compatible although there are some serious flaws in evolution and its current model which means that doubts are not "irrational" as the mentally ill atheist would proclaim.

Sunday, 15 January 2012

Proof of Adam and Eve + Scientific Facts in The Bible

In my previous post, I discussed a bit about Adam and Eve but I made some errors. In fact, the corrections I came across only further prove that the Genesis account of human origin is right and science seems to back this up. Every human can trace their ancestry back to one woman (Mitochondrial Eve) through their mother's side and they can trace their ancestry back to one man (Y-Chromosomal Adam) through their father's side. According to science, Mitochondrial Eve and Y-Chromosomal Adam don't need to live at the same for everyone to be descended from them. But come on, The Bible says we can trace our ancestry back to one man and women and now science is saying something similar? It's no coincidence.

This is just further proof that Genesis holds truth.

Evolutionists can't explain how "primitive desert dwelling" men got our ancestry right thousands of years before science. It seems as though the authors of The Bible weren't that primitive after all. Shall we examine other scientific facts that are found in The Bible? Yes, we shall!

Job 26:7 - "[God] hangeth the earth on nothing." - Other cultures believed that the earth was flat or supported by something. Here, we clearly see The Bible claiming that the earth is supported by nothing. It's claiming that it's suspended in space and this is correct. How could ordinary humans who hadn't the equipment to explore space know this? Once again, this is proof that The Bible is inspired by the word of God who exists beyond this world and beyond this very universe.

Psalm 18:15 "The valleys of the sea were exposed and the foundations of the earth laid bareat your rebuke, O Lord, at the blast of the breath from your nostrils." - This is King David singing about God. Here he mentions the "valleys of the sea". How could King David know about trenches and canyons in the deepest pits of the sea? How could anyone thousands of years ago know about them? They hadn't the equipment to go and explore that deep down into the sea and yet we see King David singing about them. Obviously King David was inspired by the word of God would would know about the trenches and canyons of the sea since he created the world.

Psalm 8:8 - "...the birds of the air, the fish of the sea, all that swim the paths of the sea." -  Yet another verse that King David sung (yes, King David loved his singing) and in it, King David mentions the fish swimming in the paths of the sea. Paths of the sea? What could these be? Well these are the currents of the sea which probably weren't discovered by men back thousands of years ago. How could they have know about them? They hadn't the equipment to measure or the equipment to go and explore the sea but yet again, we see the masterful David singing about such a thing that would have been beyond the knowledge of ordinary humans. Once again, this is proof he was inspired by a higher being and once again, this proves The Bible had scientific facts long before scientists discovered them.

May God bless his servant David! Amen! David's songs alone prove the credibility of The Bible and even though he no longer exists on this world, he is still a great servant for our God.

Jeremiah 10:12 - "He has made the earth by his power, he has established the world by his wisdom, and has stretched out the heavens at his discretion." - Yet another scientific fact. Scientists have only recently discovered that the universe is expanding. The Bible knew this thousands of years back. Note that "heavens" refers to space.

Hebrew 11:3 - "By faith we understand the the worlds were framed by the word of God, so that the things which are seen were not made of things which are visible." - Hmmm. It sounds as though The Bible is speaking of particles. Yet another scientific fact that The Bible got right before science.

Job 38:16 - "Have you entered the springs of the sea? Or have you walked in search of the depths?" - Yet another scientific fact. How could The Bible have known about the sea vents at the bottom of the oceans?

Psalm 147:4 - "He counts the numbers of stars; he calls them all by name." - King David on God counting the stars and naming them. How could a man who existed thousands of years ago know that there was a finite number of stars? Again, this is proof that the words of David (like the rest of The Bible) are inspired by God. Once again, The Bible is correct before science came and showed everyone that there were a finite number of stars.

Ecclesiates 1:6 - "The wing goes toward the south, And turns around to the north; The wind whirls about continually, And comes again on its circuit." - King Solomon on the wind. It seems that he knew about the jet streams which are found on numerous worlds. King Solomon's wisdom was gained from God and thus everything he knew would have been what God knew. Once again, The Bible got it right long before science which "discovered" jet streams in the 1930's.

There are many more scientific facts in The Bible but these are the major ones. Once again, this proves that The Bible holds more weight than the atheist's theories which are unproven.

Atheism is a pathetic little theory. It is odious and an insult to the universe. No evidence will ever support it.

Friday, 13 January 2012

Atheism Debunked with Logic and Science

I created this blog in reply to some girl who got prayer banned from her school (Link). She then started boasting on Twitter about how awesome she, atheism and her evolution was. This blog not only humiliates and destroys atheism but it also debunks macro-evolution and proves that The Bible has outside sources which back it.

Let us begin with debunking macro-evolution within the evolution theory:

(Author's note: If any evolution occurred then it's not the macro and godless evolution that atheists proposed. Evolution is a flawed theory that has many gaps that needs addressing. However any criticism at it from anyone often leads to scorn from the atheists who refuse to accept any flaws or gaps in their Darwinism - which is literally religious evolutionism - even though science is all about progressing theories as further tests are conducted and new evidence arises. Speciation, natural selection and gene migration are all observable and proven as is Mendal's genetic law of inheritance. Macro-evolution remains unobserved with no complete chain of fossils proving it. Meanwhile the godless evolution of atheists would propose abiogenesis - a hypothesis fueled on speculation contrary to the law of biogenesis - as the origin of life which has no evidence whatsoever and is unfalsifiable and therefore not scientific.)

Question 1:

Are there any fossils showing the evolutionary process of ape to man?


No. No such fossils exist. No fossils exist showing the evolutionary process of ape to man, no fossils exist showing the evolutionary process of dinosaur to mammal and no fossils exist showing the evolutionary process of dinosaur to bird (yes, there is the dinosaur bird - Archaeopteryx - but that's exactly what it is - a dinosaur bird and nothing more which is why there are no fossils showing the evolutionary process of it.).

Darwin himself stated that the biggest argument against his theory would be a lack of transitional fossils which he predicted would be found very shortly. More than a century later and we are still lacking transitional fossils because they don't exist. If evolution were true, MILLIONS of transitional fossils would exist but none do.

Question 2:

Okay. So no fossils exist but evidence has shown that we have evolved from groups of apes from all around the world.


Nope! Eve is the ancestor of all humans and science even supports this. Science claims that all everyone can trace their ancestry back to one woman through their mother's side. Where science has got it wrong is where they claim Eve was not the first woman and they call her Mitochondrial Eve. Science says that everyone can trace their ancestry back to her but that she didn't need exist at the same time as Y-Chromosome Adam whom everyone can also trace their ancestry back to through their father's side. It seems as though science is now saying that it's possible that we can all trace ancestry back to one man and one woman and this supports the Genesis account of the origin of mankind. Is it a coincidence that The Bible says that everyone can track their ancestors back to Adam and Eve (one woman and man) and now science almost says the same? No, it's not a coincidence. Science has got it slightly wrong but it's now supporting what skeptics had previously thought impossible.

No, mankind never came from simply Adam and Eve but THEY were the first humans created. Other humans were created which is why Cain speaks about them when he is exiled from the land of his parents after his kills his brother. He tells God that "others might try to kill him" and God puts a curse on him to prevent this.

The reason why everyone can trace ancestry back to Adam and Eve is because everyone shares ancestry with Noah. Every other human died out during the flood (which all cultures and beliefs speak of) save for Noah's children and their spouses who came from families from all over the world but since their children have Noah's blood, they have Adam and Eve's blood and thus all decedents from them have Adam and Eve's blood.

Question 3:

Okay. So no fossils exist and we can trace ancestry back to one woman and man. What about the DNA linking us to ape with 98% of our DNA matching theirs?


Sorry evolutionists, scientists identified some 40 million differences among the three billion DNA molecules, or nucleotides, in each genome of human and chimp/ape which separates us MASSIVELY from chimps and apes. 40 million differences makes us completely different from chimps and shows we aren't a higher form of ape and that our DNA do not match theirs. Science has proved itself that we don't share 98% DNA with apes.

Further more, scientists once said that we share 99% of our DNA with mouses. We know that's a lie for obvious reasons. Remember evolutionists, science isn't always right and it makes mistakes.

Question 4:

Okay. So no fossils exist, we can trace our ancestry back to one woman and man and our DNA doesn't match the ape's DNA but why do some animals look the same?


Animals don't share the same common ancestors. They share the same creator who created every animal with the same blueprint. There is, however, one discovery that appears to make the evolutionary view of descent from a common ancestor look illogical and flawed. This discovery is that structures that appear homologous often develop under the control of genes that are not homologous. If the structures evolved from the same source, you would expect the same genes to make the structures. The fact that these structures are similar (or homologous) is apparent, but the reason is not because of Darwinian evolution. It is more logical and reasonable to believe in a common Creator rather than a common ancestor.

Question 5:

Okay. So no fossils exist, we can trace our ancestry back to one woman and man and our DNA doesn't match the ape's DNA and animals don't share the same ancestor but how does God exist? I'd still rather believe that we are just random accidents because it makes me feel good about myself.


How does God exist? Well let's look at the human body firstly:

We have the human circulatory system which is a very good example of design. Not only does it function very well but it also shows design and a complex structure that only an intelligent being could creation. Next we have the heart pumping blood throughout the body, the lungs which breath in oxygen and release the oxygen and then we have the human body with two matching eyes/ears/eyebrows/nostrils on each level of each other and then we have the perfect structure of the teeth. That's no random accident, this would describe random:








Nothing matches, nothing shows design, nothing shows thought, that's random and the universe and the human body is nothing like that, the human body and universe show thought. Thought and design CANNOT come from chaos. Logic argues against this. Thought and design all come from an intelligent mind. Think of one explanation where design comes from chaos. You cannot. Bombs do not produce vast cities just as throwing a brick at a wall won't produce anything that shows order. For atheism to be true, design and order would have to come from chaos which comes from nothing. You wouldn't attribute a computer to chaos or nothingness, so don't attribute the butterfly or universe to nothingness, both share the same creator...GOD!

Evolution is just a shield for those to say that everything has been done by nature alone but its theory is meant to only explain the variety of life not the origin. Even if it was true without any flaw (which it's not, the theory is heavily flawed), this still doesn't prove the assertions and assumptions of the atheist about a godless universe.

Symmetry further proves the existence of God because it shows that a force that could see was behind creation. Evolution is an unconscious force that doesn't think, if it was real, there would be no such thing as symmetry because it can't see to produce such designs twice just as it can't smell to give creatures noses. Yes, ask yourself evolutionists, how did creatures evolve noses? Smells cannot be detected by feeling or sight can they? How did animals evolve wings? Did they just start jumping about randomly until they evolved wings one day? How silly to believe such!

The fact that we observe intelligence in animals along with patterns of behavior that appeared passed down from their parents shows that an intelligent mind was behind design. Everything in the universe and on this world is balanced. We observe recycling (life in death) in nature for instance. Balance could not exist unless a mind was behind this universe.

Without an intelligent mind to put everything into order, there would only be chaos and we do NOT observe such in the universe.

Atheism is the belief that the universe came from nothing. So how could nothing place everything into order? How could nothing appoint gravity to hold everything together? How could nothing form the universe into a way in which we could study it and learn about it? How could nothing give us the needed resources to build whatever we want? How could nothing give us all the plants and resources needed to cure illnesses?

Atheism is senseless and don't just take my word for it, even Sir Issac Newton - author of the most influential science book ever - said as much!

Want proof that The Bible is authentic to history? Well, here is a list of some artifacts which support many of the events mentioned in The Bible:

The Black Obelisk of Shalmaneser III, shows the Biblical Jehu, king of Israel. It describes how Jehu brought or sent his tribute in or around 841 BCE.

The Nabonidus Cylinder proves Belshazzar's existence; Belshazzar was a king of Babylon and he is mentioned in The Book Of Daniel in The Bible. The Nabonidus Cylinder proves Belshazzar did indeed exist. This gives evidence that The Book Of Daniel is historically correct.

The Shishaq Relief is a series of inscriptions recounting pharaoh Shishaq's invasion of Judah and Israel in 925 BC. When the king of Egypt laid siege to Jerusalem, Rehoboam gave him all of the treasures out of the temple as a tribute. This is recorded here.

Further evidence that The Bible is correct is that Sennacherib's Prism, details the events of Sennacherib's campaign against Judah which is mentioned in The Bible as well. Sennacherib's campaign against Judah
is described in great detail in The Bible. To bring together the biblical account and the records of the Assyrian emperor shows vindication of the Bible as historical fact.

More Artifacts That You Should Research About, Which Prove That The Bible is Historically Correct:

Amarna letters (c. 1300s BC) - correspondence on clay tablets between the Egyptian administration and various Middle East kings petty sub-rulers in Canaan during the New Kingdom.

Arch of Titus - (c. 82 AD) This relief shows spoils from the sack of Jerusalem by the Romans in 70 AD. Depicted are the menorah and trumpets, as well as what might be the Table of Showbread.

Babylonian Chronicles (c. 747 BC - 247 BC) - This deals with Nebuchadnezzar's siege of Jerusalem, etc. Read the books of Zedekiah and Book of Kings, Book of Jeremiah, Lamentations.

Balaam inscription (c. 840-760 BC) 9th or 8th century BC inscription about the prophet named Balaam from The Book of Numbers.

Bulla of Jehucal - son of Shelemiah, son of Shevi. This person is mentioned in the Book of Jeremiah who thus presumably lived in the late 7th century BC (i.e. at about the same time as Jeremiah).

Cylinder of Cyrus (c. 559 BC-530 BC) - This regards King Cyrus's treatment of religion, which is significant to the books of Chronicles, Ezra and Nehemiah.

Deluge Tablet - The Epic of Gilgamesh records a Babylonian flood story; this connects to Genesis and gives evidence that it is historically correct.

Bubastis portal - showing a series of inscriptions recounting pharaoh Shishaq's invasion of Judah and Israel in 925 BC, located outside the Temple of Amun at Karnak.(1 Kings 14:25; 2 Chronicles 12:1-12).

Ipuwer Papyrus (c. 13th century BC) - ancient papyrus manuscript describing Egypt as afflicted by natural disasters and in a state of chaos. Statements such as "the River is blood" can be interpreted as an Egyptian account of the Plagues of Egypt described in the Book of Exodus in the Bible.

Susa remains - Susa is mentioned in the Ketuvim of the Hebrew Bible, mainly in Esther, but also once each in Nehemiah and Daniel. Both Daniel and Nehemiah lived in Susa during the Babylonian captivity of Judah of the 6th century BC. Esther became queen there, and saved the Jews from genocide. A tomb presumed to be that of Daniel is located in the area, known as Shush-Daniel. The tomb is marked by an unusual white, stone cone, which is neither regular nor symmetric.

Taylor Prism - a clay prism inscribed with the annals of the Assyrian king Sennacherib notable for describing his siege of Jerusalem in 701 BC during the reign of king Hezekiah. This event is recorded in several books contained in Bible including Isaiah chapters 33 and 36; 2 Kings 18:17; 2 Chronicles 32:9. This event is also recorded by Herodotus.

These artifacts show The Bible is historically correct. Many ask for outside evidence to prove that events in The Bible were indeed real and here you have them. Christians don't follow The Bible due to blind faith, archaeology has proven that many of the events did happen and logic supports the existence of a God who designed this beautiful universe.

It is an insult to believe that this universe came from nothing. Atheists like to boast about how much they know about science but in reality, they know nothing about science otherwise they wouldn't be illogical enough to attribute creation to nothing. It's more logical to believe we were created and designed than the theory that we were random accidents. Maybe atheists are happy to believe the universe was a random accident and that life was too and maybe they are happy to believe they came from apes which eat their own excrement but logic argues against their fairy tale theory.

We were designed and created. God is real. Get over it atheists.